Respect is the cornerstone of workplace culture. Yet, in many organizations, employees describe their work environment as uncivil—characterized by dismissive comments, exclusion from conversations, sarcasm, or disrespectful tone. While these behaviors may not always meet the legal definition of harassment, they often feel like harassment to the individuals on the receiving end.
That perception matters. Employees who feel disrespected frequently interpret incivility through the lens of “Why me?” and, in the absence of answers, may conclude that their race, gender, religion, age, disability, or other protected category explains the treatment. The next step? A formal complaint.
How Incivility Can Escalate into Discrimination Claims
- Perception of Targeting. An employee repeatedly interrupted or dismissed in meetings may feel they are being treated differently because of gender. A worker excluded from team communications may believe the exclusion is based on race or age.
- Pattern of Behavior. Investigators often find that the alleged “harassment” is really a collection of uncivil interactions. While one instance may be brushed off, a repeated pattern creates the perception of bias.
- Blurred Lines Between Civility and Legality. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) doesn’t enforce a “general civility code.” But when disrespectful conduct aligns with a protected basis, the line blurs. Example: A supervisor who uses demeaning language toward everyone is seen as “difficult.” But if that same tone is directed disproportionately toward women or older employees, it takes on a discriminatory cast.
What Investigators See
When an EEO investigator receives a case rooted in claims of harassment, the file often contains incidents that, on the surface, look like rudeness or poor communication. Yet investigators know to ask:
- Is the behavior tied to a protected class? Was the disrespect directed disproportionately toward employees of one gender, race, or religion?
- Is there a pattern? Do multiple employees share similar experiences that suggest systemic issues?
- How does the complainant describe the impact? Employees frequently describe the emotional toll of incivility as creating a hostile work environment, even if the legal threshold for harassment isn’t met.
For investigators, the challenge is separating the “incivility” that reflects poor workplace culture from the “unlawful discrimination” that violates Title VII or other statutes. Both require attention—one legally, the other organizationally.
Why Leaders Must Care
- Risk Management: Unchecked incivility increases the likelihood of complaints escalating to formal charges.
- Retention: Employees leave environments where respect is absent.
- Reputation: A culture that tolerates disrespect harms not only morale but also brand image.
Leaders are accountable for modeling respectful behavior. By setting a tone of civility, they not only protect their organizations legally but also build environments where employees thrive.
Final Thought
About the Author
Sharon E Harrington, MA, CPTD, is the founder of Amediate LLC and a workplace communication expert with nearly 30 years of experience. As an EEO Investigator and Certified Professional in Talent Development, she helps organizations navigate complex workplace dynamics and build harmonious professional environments through her innovative "Leadership for the Learning Organization" program.
Learn more about Sharon's work → | Connect on LinkedIn